tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post82440697634236584..comments2024-01-24T22:11:26.202+02:00Comments on הקץ המגולה: Happy is One Who Waits...גילויhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10600628881119650305noreply@blogger.comBlogger31125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-42575519660424599782008-12-10T17:20:00.000+02:002008-12-10T17:20:00.000+02:00The 1260 years seems to be a Christian invention b...The 1260 years seems to be a Christian invention based on mistaken ideas regarding the calendar and the words of Daniel.גילויhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10600628881119650305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-15471192291863834952008-12-10T17:17:00.000+02:002008-12-10T17:17:00.000+02:00You may also want to look at the 1260 days that th...You may also want to look at the 1260 days that the Daniels state the Temple will be trampled under foot by the Gentiles. It is exactly 1260 years from 687-688 to 1948 (year of the return of the nation Israel).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-69512405016276066612008-03-31T20:01:00.000+03:002008-03-31T20:01:00.000+03:00Anonymous poster regarding 187 years:You are makin...Anonymous poster regarding 187 years:<BR/><BR/>You are making an essential mistake in the interpretation of the Jewish calendar, confusing 2 events.<BR/><BR/>The permission given by Cyrus (Koresh) to come back to the land of Israel was in the first year of his reign, which was 3390 according to Seder Olam Rabba.<BR/><BR/>The 3410 you refer to (really 3408 or 3409 according to traditional sources) is referring to the 2nd year of Darius (Daryavesh), when the 2nd Beit HaMikdash was built. You are compressing the calendar further than the Jewish chronology does, for you have left out the reign of Cyrus, Achashverosh, and the first year of Darius.<BR/><BR/>See here:<BR/><BR/>http://keitzmeguleh.blogspot.com/2007/12/70-years.htmlגילויhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10600628881119650305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-9016074624391778362008-03-31T19:08:00.000+03:002008-03-31T19:08:00.000+03:00I believe you stated: "However, according to the p...I believe you stated: "However, according to the physical reality, the 1st Beit HaMikdash was not destroyed 2430 years ago, but rather a further 163 years prior in the year 3175 (586 BCE)."<BR/>Actually, the discrepancy is 187 years: <BR/>The Babylonian exile ended in 538 B.C.E. with Cyrus' edict allowing the Jews to return to Jerusalem and rebuild the Mikdash. This date is supported by Ptolemy's Canon which recorded the occurrence of lunar eclipses during the Nabonasser Era, and which is verified by computerized astronomy. According to the Jewish calendar this was in the year 3410 AM (Aryeh Carmell: Aids to Talmund Study; 4th Ed., V. IX: The Roman Republic; 133-44 BC; Pompey's Later Campaigns, p. 382). I demonstrated the problem in 1987:<BR/><BR/>1987 CE + 538 BCE = 2525 years<BR/>5748 AM - 3410 AM = 2338 years<BR/>2525 yrs. - 2328 yrs. = 187 years difference in the calendars.<BR/><BR/>Not 163 -- twenty-four years further down the road.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-80670316179733179982008-03-23T10:18:00.000+02:002008-03-23T10:18:00.000+02:00So a conclusion is that the sod of the calculation...So a conclusion is that the sod of the calculations of Kol HaTor is tamun also in Daniel 12גילויhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10600628881119650305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-30237518945375889912008-03-23T10:06:00.000+02:002008-03-23T10:06:00.000+02:00"I would mefaresh differently. 66 was not in the G..."I would mefaresh differently. 66 was not in the Galil, but Mitzraim."<BR/>That is true. <BR/><BR/>I think the opportunity also existed 200 years earlier.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-63267655667253777992008-03-23T07:19:00.000+02:002008-03-23T07:19:00.000+02:00I would mefaresh differently. 66 was not in the G...I would mefaresh differently. 66 was not in the Galil, but Mitzraim. The keitz of 1200 + 72 is as follows:<BR/><BR/>Count 1200 years.<BR/><BR/>Count to 70/72 years, try to merit Zachu Geulah.<BR/><BR/>If we are unable, we must by Itaruta Diletata (or maaseh tsaddikim if you prefer) restart the count from 66 back to 1.<BR/><BR/>Question:<BR/><BR/>Was year 66 the *only* chance to merge the 2 counts, or was it just the last one before 70? I.e. was the opportunity also available some 200 years prior?גילויhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10600628881119650305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-59157885140657517432008-03-23T06:42:00.000+02:002008-03-23T06:42:00.000+02:00I agree, תרין בחבורא חדא ורזא חדא. What makes it s...I agree, תרין בחבורא חדא ורזא חדא. What makes it stronger is the connection with the 1290 of Daniel - there is time for another 66. Moshiach ben Yosef appearing in the Galil at 66, it already happened, but the process was cut off. The famous story is that the Arizal shortly before a Shabbat told his students to join him and go to Yerushalayim for Shabbat (coming from Tzfat!) and then the Geula would come. The students were not able and the opportunity was missed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-25731931069511332462008-03-22T21:26:00.000+02:002008-03-22T21:26:00.000+02:00Perhaps 3320 + 1200 + 66, due to the sod of the va...Perhaps 3320 + 1200 + 66, due to the sod of the vav, start over again, count to 72 (and on to 100).<BR/><BR/>That is to say that the miluy of the vav is key to this.גילויhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10600628881119650305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-2386765018540303622008-03-22T21:21:00.000+02:002008-03-22T21:21:00.000+02:00The 69/70 weeks of Daniel 9 have a limited target,...The 69/70 weeks of Daniel 9 have a limited target, detailed in verse 24. It does not have Techiat HaMetim yet. At 72, the Briyah is restored, but we count on to 100. I saw that HaSulam has this also.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-18004810127981848302008-03-22T20:50:00.000+02:002008-03-22T20:50:00.000+02:00Interesting. I think we need to understand what t...Interesting. I think we need to understand what the GR"A writes bimforash. I read in Likutei HaGR"A over Shabbos (the old one which is all sod) that there is a keitz after the 1200 and the 72. I think that is also in Yahel Ohr to Pinchas Raya Mehemna. Does he mean 1200 + 66 + 72? That is 1338.גילויhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10600628881119650305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-76521387624945608602008-03-22T20:40:00.000+02:002008-03-22T20:40:00.000+02:00Something cool regarding the Chiluk 1200 + 66 + 69...Something cool regarding the Chiluk <BR/>1200 + 66 + 69 = 1335.<BR/><BR/>In Zohar Shemot 9b, it is explained that the Galut is 12*100 and then 66. And after that, by logic we should add 69, as we have to get to 1335, 100 years for every tribe. It is nistar, but we can conclude that the meaning of this Zohar is that the Galut is 12*(100+66) = 1992 years, with another 69 to reach 1335.<BR/><BR/>The 1335 counts from Et Husar HaTamid. If we take 1338-18=1320, the 66 brings us to 5312. We add one, because Seder Olam counted from Adam, and we count from Tohu. So we get to 5313, to the Arizal. The Arizal accomplished a tikun that sped up the count to redemption. From units of 12 we go to units of 7. This is intuitive: it makes the remaing 69 as the 69 weeks of Daniel. The weeks come out to be Shmita weeks (5313 is dividable by 7). The 60th week is 5727-5733, from the six-day war until the year before the Yom-Kippur war. A week in which Hester Panim was slightly lifted, temporarily. Week 66 is about to start: 5769-5775. <BR/><BR/>This misses some "fine-structure" but it gives the perspective, and it is easy to catch and remember.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-53430629614248651642008-03-18T07:38:00.000+02:002008-03-18T07:38:00.000+02:00The division is implied in the Zohar and made expl...The division is implied in the Zohar and made explicit by the Ramchal in Maamar HaGeulah. 60 for Yaakov, 6 for Yosef. The Ramchal writes that at the Pekidah, if I recall it correctly, that the person Moshiach ben Yosef attains his role.גילויhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10600628881119650305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-279536547689550432008-03-18T04:57:00.000+02:002008-03-18T04:57:00.000+02:00Perhaps you can say this. The Sod of 66 regards do...Perhaps you can say this. The Sod of 66 regards doubling/splitting of times of geula, Pekida-Zechira. It applies within itself (66=60+6) but also to itself: The first 66 is the Pekida and the second Zechira.<BR/><BR/>1200 + 66 is the Arizal, 1200 + 60 the birth of Rav Yosef Karo, and in between was the inquisition and the rise of Tsfat.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-78379911038811678202008-03-17T22:50:00.000+02:002008-03-17T22:50:00.000+02:00Maybe we can compromise and say that the Pekidah s...Maybe we can compromise and say that the Pekidah started when Chesed reached 500, peaked at 60, and faded when Din reached 500?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-45378383756558469952008-03-17T21:28:00.000+02:002008-03-17T21:28:00.000+02:00So the new Tekufah is the Pekidah. Is that from 5...So the new Tekufah is the Pekidah. Is that from 500 in the right or also the left?גילויhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10600628881119650305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-48620737566214737602008-03-17T20:58:00.000+02:002008-03-17T20:58:00.000+02:00Two times 66, I must agree, Zohar Shemot could be ...Two times 66, I must agree, Zohar Shemot could be read like this. Staggeringly deep.<BR/><BR/>So we have two principles: <BR/><BR/>1200 + 72 + 1335 physical years from 3175 until Bayit Shlishi<BR/><BR/>1200 + 66 + 66 "years" from 3338 to MBY. (And three more gives again 1335.)<BR/><BR/>In addition, I think we were led to understand that the 60 before MBY occurred when the counts of Din and Chesed reached 500. The end of one Tekufa equals the beginning of the other.<BR/><BR/>B'Chasdei HaShem.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-65245092772314531692008-03-17T11:03:00.000+02:002008-03-17T11:03:00.000+02:00If we have 1200 plus 65 before the Arizal, and 70 ...If we have 1200 plus 65 before the Arizal, and 70 from the Arizal onwards, leading to 1335, we must check what happened at 1290. The birth of the GR"A. The question is how to connect it to the pasuk.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-11364810327666815402008-03-17T09:57:00.000+02:002008-03-17T09:57:00.000+02:00The preface I forgot on this post is that there ar...The preface I forgot on this post is that there are other valid peirushim that have come to fruition / are coming to fruition.גילויhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10600628881119650305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-37486074540296529242008-03-17T09:52:00.000+02:002008-03-17T09:52:00.000+02:00So we have 1200 plus 65 before the Arizal and 70 f...So we have 1200 plus 65 before the Arizal and 70 from the Arizal onwards. That adds up to 1335. Happy is One Who Waits.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-6980259931117847512008-03-17T08:38:00.000+02:002008-03-17T08:38:00.000+02:00Zohar Shemot 9b, last few lines. Vav is spelled ו...Zohar Shemot 9b, last few lines. Vav is spelled וו, implying two 66's.גילויhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10600628881119650305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-18739520808352173052008-03-17T08:32:00.000+02:002008-03-17T08:32:00.000+02:00But also see 70 assuming no Arizal.But also see 70 assuming no Arizal.גילויhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10600628881119650305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-3022458176403015032008-03-17T08:29:00.000+02:002008-03-17T08:29:00.000+02:00The Arizal. Brilliant.The Arizal. Brilliant.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-32933716063098761352008-03-17T07:32:00.000+02:002008-03-17T07:32:00.000+02:00Incase it is not explicit enough (for you): 3338 -...Incase it is not explicit enough (for you): 3338 - 18 + 1200, and the next "year" is year 1. See year 66 and 70.גילויhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10600628881119650305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026267186873715335.post-32697821634733007222008-03-17T07:30:00.000+02:002008-03-17T07:30:00.000+02:00Perhaps the academics are somewhat right. Perhaps...Perhaps the academics are somewhat right. Perhaps those that were responsible for the publishing of the Zohar interpreted the 1200 year prophecies as such, while those that started the traditions had no intention. The result is that the Zohar predictions were not taken seriously by the outside world, as it is meant to be.גילויhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10600628881119650305noreply@blogger.com